• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Ihof Logo Header 182px 67px
Search DropdownSearch Icon2023 Awards
  • About
    • Advisory Board
    • 2023 Induction Ceremony
    • Previous Events
  • Inductees
  • News
    • Blog
    • Announcements
  • 2023 Awards
Home / Inductee Profiles / Untold Internet: The Internet-OSI Standards Wars
12 November 2015

Untold Internet: The Internet-OSI Standards Wars

The 1973 paper by Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn describing TCP/IP represented the start of the ‘Internet Age.’ By 1987, key developments in the U.S. planted seeds for the global Internet: adoption of TCP/IP by the ARPANET, and two TCP/IP-based, National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded community networks. These were CSNET (the Computer Science Network) and the NSFNET.

What is often overlooked is that this U.S. activity was not emulated elsewhere. Governments of almost every country actively opposed Internet adoption. They viewed the Internet as a non-standard U.S. technology. They favored a collection of protocols, commonly referred to as OSI (Open Systems Interconnection), being developed by the world’s standards bodies (such as the International Organization for Standardization). In Europe, most national governments and the European Commission would not fund Internet R&D.

A headshot of Vint Cerf.

In the U.S., there also was anti-Internet pressure. The Commerce Department supported the GOSIP (Government OSI Profile) directive requiring that OSI be included on U.S. government computer purchases. And many U.S. companies preferred OSI to TCP/IP.

So why did the Internet prevail? The OSI standards, designed by committees, were a hodgepodge of functionality. There were built-in barriers to interoperability. Some were never fully implemented. Standards adoption took years. The effort essentially collapsed as a result of its cumbersome processes. Conversely, Internet development was lightweight, depending on iterative open community-based design and continuous testing of prototype code for correctness and interoperability. And throughout the 1980s, NSF and DARPA did not waver in their support of the Internet.

As a result, by 1990, the Internet had won. This competition had cost the non-U.S. world dearly. Billions of dollars were wasted and, perhaps more important, the result of government interference was that the commercial benefits of the Internet largely flowed to U.S. industry.

Authored by Internet Hall of Fame inductee Lawrence Landweber ([email protected]), this is the second in a three-part series, the ‘Untold Internet’, exploring some of the more unfamiliar aspects of Internet history.  

Related Posts

6 April 2015

Srinivasan Ramani on Indian Engineers, MOOCs and Intergalactic Travel

Read More about Srinivasan Ramani on Indian Engineers, MOOCs and Intergalactic Travel

14 July 2015

Esterhuysen On Human Rights and Internet-freedom Movements

Read More about Esterhuysen On Human Rights and Internet-freedom Movements

3 February 2015

Paul Vixie’s Top Tips for Increasing Internet Users’ Digital Security

Read More about Paul Vixie’s Top Tips for Increasing Internet Users’ Digital Security

20 October 2015

The Untold Internet

Read More about The Untold Internet

Footer

Facebook F 1
Twitter 1
Youtube 1
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us

The Internet Hall of Fame is presented by:

Internet Society 76x25

USA

11710 Plaza America Drive
Suite 400
Reston, VA 20190
+1-703-439-2120

Switzerland

Rue Vallin 2
CH-1201 Geneva
+41-22-807-1444

Other Offices

© 2023 Internet Society